inspector calls
... Gerald is the one twisting the scene at the beginning by taking on a role parallel to the inspector. ... Then he announces “There’s no inspector Goole on the police”. ... Sheila adopts the inspector’s (and priestley’s) philosophical standpoint as she has ideas similar to the ones of the inspector (and Priestley). This is expressed in the play by her admitting to the mistakes she made and by repeating words of the inspector “Fire and blood and anguish” trying to make it cleat that they should learn from their mistakes and that she is angry at the way they talk and go on pretending nothing happened. So Priestley presents his ideas through Sheila and Eric now that the inspector has gone, engaging the audience and making the scene interesting because of the use of social/ historical comments. The effect of the inspector, whoever he may have been was to split the family irrevocably. ... “There are people in this town who dislike me enough to do that” Gerald then begins to lead of into another path in the play by giving the characters the idea that the whole situation was a joke and that no girl had really die because he brings in the thought that the inspector might not of been showing the same photo to each person. ... Mr Birling laughs and jokes about the situation but Sheila sticks with her strong feelings “Whoever that inspector was he was anything but a joke. ... Birling puts down the phone he has a long wait looking frightened and then reveals a girl has died and that a second inspector will be arriving to ask some questions changing the atmosphere in the audience again for a final time. ... The first audience relates to World War one in the sense that it was the first punishment for their uncaring actions and behaviour and then as a result of them not learning their lesson the same problem happens again (the second inspector) which relates to World War two. ... Gerald is the one twisting the scene at the beginning by taking on a role parallel to the inspector. ... Then he announces “There’s no inspector Goole on the police”. ... Sheila adopts the inspector’s (and priestley’s) philosophical standpoint as she has ideas similar to the ones of the inspector (and Priestley). This is expressed in the play by her admitting to the mistakes she made and by repeating words of the inspector “Fire and blood and anguish” trying to make it cleat that they should learn from their mistakes and that she is angry at the way they talk and go on pretending nothing happened. So Priestley presents his ideas through Sheila and Eric now that the inspector has gone, engaging the audience and making the scene interesting because of the use of social/ historical comments. The effect of the inspector, whoever he may have been was to split the family irrevocably. ... “There are people in this town who dislike me enough to do that” Gerald then begins to lead of into another path in the play by giving the characters the idea that the whole situation was a joke and that no girl had really die because he brings in the thought that the inspector might not of been showing the same photo to each person. ... Mr Birling laughs and jokes about the situation but Sheila sticks with her strong feelings “Whoever that inspector was he was anything but a joke. ... Birling puts down the phone he has a long wait looking frightened and then reveals a girl has died and that a second inspector will be arriving to ask some questions changing the atmosphere in the audience again for a final time. ... The first audience relates to World War one in the sense that it was the first punishment for their uncaring actions and behaviour and then as a result of them not learning their lesson the same problem happens again (the second inspector) which relates to World War two. ... Gerald is the one twisting the scene at the beginning by taking on a role parallel to the inspector. ... Then he announces “There’s no inspector Goole on the police”. ... Sheila adopts the inspector’s (and priestley’s) philosophical standpoint as she has ideas similar to the ones of the inspector (and Priestley). This is expressed in the play by her admitting to the mistakes she made and by repeating words of the inspector “Fire and blood and anguish” trying to make it cleat that they should learn from their mistakes and that she is angry at the way they talk and go on pretending nothing happened. So Priestley presents his ideas through Sheila and Eric now that the inspector has gone, engaging the audience and making the scene interesting because of the use of social/ historical comments. The effect of the inspector, whoever he may have been was to split the family irrevocably. ... “There are people in this town who dislike me enough to do that” Gerald then begins to lead of into another path in the play by giving the characters the idea that the whole situation was a joke and that no girl had really die because he brings in the thought that the inspector might not of been showing the same photo to each person. ... Mr Birling laughs and jokes about the situation but Sheila sticks with her strong feelings “Whoever that inspector was he was anything but a joke. ... Birling puts down the phone he has a long wait looking frightened and then reveals a girl has died and that a second inspector will be arriving to ask some questions changing the atmosphere in the audience again for a final time. ... The first audience relates to World War one in the sense that it was the first punishment for their uncaring actions and behaviour and then as a result of them not learning their lesson the same problem happens again (the second inspector) which relates to World War two. ... Gerald is the one twisting the scene at the beginning by taking on a role parallel to the inspector. ... Then he announces “There’s no inspector Goole on the police”. ... Sheila adopts the inspector’s (and priestley’s) philosophical standpoint as she has ideas similar to the ones of the inspector (and Priestley). This is expressed in the play by her admitting to the mistakes she made and by repeating words of the inspector “Fire and blood and anguish” trying to make it cleat that they should learn from their mistakes and that she is angry at the way they talk and go on pretending nothing happened. So Priestley presents his ideas through Sheila and Eric now that the inspector has gone, engaging the audience and making the scene interesting because of the use of social/ historical comments. The effect of the inspector, whoever he may have been was to split the family irrevocably. ... “There are people in this town who dislike me enough to do that” Gerald then begins to lead of into another path in the play by giving the characters the idea that the whole situation was a joke and that no girl had really die because he brings in the thought that the inspector might not of been showing the same photo to each person. ... Mr Birling laughs and jokes about the situation but Sheila sticks with her strong feelings “Whoever that inspector was he was anything but a joke. ... Birling puts down the phone he has a long wait looking frightened and then reveals a girl has died and that a second inspector will be arriving to ask some questions changing the atmosphere in the audience again for a final time. ... The first audience relates to World War one in the sense that it was the first punishment for their uncaring actions and behaviour and then as a result of them not learning their lesson the same problem happens again (the second inspector) which relates to World War two. ... Gerald is the one twisting the scene at the beginning by taking on a role parallel to the inspector. ... Then he announces “There’s no inspector Goole on the police”. ... Sheila adopts the inspector’s (and priestley’s) philosophical standpoint as she has ideas similar to the ones of the inspector (and Priestley). This is expressed in the play by her admitting to the mistakes she made and by repeating words of the inspector “Fire and blood and anguish” trying to make it cleat that they should learn from their mistakes and that she is angry at the way they talk and go on pretending nothing happened. So Priestley presents his ideas through Sheila and Eric now that the inspector has gone, engaging the audience and making the scene interesting because of the use of social/ historical comments. The effect of the inspector, whoever he may have been was to split the family irrevocably. ... “There are people in this town who dislike me enough to do that” Gerald then begins to lead of into another path in the play by giving the characters the idea that the whole situation was a joke and that no girl had really die because he brings in the thought that the inspector might not of been showing the same photo to each person.