today is December 1, 2008

Copyright © 2002-2008 freeforessays.com. All rights reserved.

Search Free For Essays


 

Search Tips


TOPICS REGISTER FAQ DIRECTORY

Essay Information

Words: 1641
Rating: None
Pages: 6.6
submitted by: sophiehoell

If you think this essay shouldn't be here then

 

Register & Login

You are viewing a preview of this essay to view the full text you must Register & Login.

If you don't currently have a login then Register here



Username:

Password:

 

  Click for Essays with Sources

Topics > People > If you cannot communicate it it isn t knowledge


Featured Papers from Direct Essays

1. Telephony

2. interpersonal communication

3. Joy Luck Club

4. sexual violence against women

5. Siddhartha 4



If you cannot communicate it it isn t knowledge

If you cannot communicate it, it isn‘t knowledge.
I completely disagree with the statement „ If you cannot communicate it, it isn‘t knowledge,“ as I believe that there are various factors that can be used to prove the opposite. The statement implies that if something cannot be explained or verbally expressed, it is nonexistent. In the following essay I will discuss this idea, linking it to Plato, Piaget, and other theories, explaining these and the connections between communication and knowledge. ... According to the statement above, because my friend wouldn‘t be able to grasp the meaning of what I am trying to say from my feeble attempts of speaking french, it would mean my point is invalid and not knowledge. I still know a mathematical formula, even if i can‘t translate it into French. Knowledge is, in my opinion, the understanding of a certain topic gained through experience or study. If I tried to explain this math theory to my friend, in french, I would most likely understand it myself, and therefore it would be knowledge. Even though I cant get her to grasp the meaning from my french, this formula would be known to me, and everyone else with an understanding of mathematics, and it would still be knowledge, even though not for that certain friend. Just because I cannot translate something does not make it nonexistent. ... These things are instinctive and introspective knowledge. ... Yet only because we cannot communicate whether it is for example fluffy or non-fluffy snow, because we are lacking the specific word, does not mean we cannot distinguish between the two. ... “ It is true that we take language for granted, and it could alter the way we think, but in the end knowledge doesn‘t always need words. ...
Its a circle one cannot figure out, if the basis of knowledge is language or personal interpretation, would you then say that language is the basis of knowledge? ... To me this theory creates an inner and an outer world, the inner being your knowledge, and the outer your ability to explain it.


To link to this page, copy the following code to your site:



All Papers Are For Research And Reference Purposes Only!
You may not turn these papers in as your own! You must cite our web site as your source!

Exchange Links With Free For Essays