Many definitions of economic freedom and distributive justice can be found in the literature regarding poverty and inequality. One reoccurring theme among different authors is the distinction between “freedom from” and “freedom to.” This distinction is necessary because each approach has different implications on what is “equal” in a society and whether this equality should be desired. First, we need some basic understanding of what exactly “freedom from” and “freedom to” are. The latter is easier to explain. “Freedom to” means freedom to shape one’s own life. The Declaration of Independence defines this idea more clearly as “Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness.” Milton Friedman called this “personal equality.” Personal equality soon developed into equality of opportunity. That is, everyone has the same opportunities to succeed and shape their lives as they see fit (As long as it does not interfere with others’ opportunities). We will also see that many different views exist regarding the meaning of equal opportunity. “Freedom from” can be interpreted as freedom from certain conditions that are viewed as “bad.” This condition could be poverty or discrimination or slavery. “Freedom from” demands that the worse off be made better so they are no longer in the regarded “bad” condition.
To link to this page, copy the following code to your site:
All Papers Are For Research And Reference Purposes Only!
You may not turn these papers in as your own! You must cite our web site as your source!
