NFL nat sec vs indiv rights
Affirmative Case (National security in times of war VS. Individual rights) “But only the greatest dangers can outweigh that of changing the public order, and the sacred power of the laws should never be interfered with except when the safety of the country is at stake”. Because I agree with these words given By Jean Jacque Rousseau, defending national security over individual rights, I must affirm the resolution which states "When the u.s is engaged in military conflict the demands of national security ought to supercede the conflicting claims of individual rights". ... Nation--Merriam / Webster’s Online Dictionary--a territorial division containing a body of people of one or more nationalities and usually characterized by relatively large size and independent status Security--Merriam / Webster’s Online Dictionary--measures taken to guard against espionage or sabotage, crime, attack, or escape Conflict--Merriam / Webster’s Online Dictionary--opposition between persons or forces Rights--Merriam / Webster’s Online Dictionary--the power or privilege to which one is justly entitled With these key terms now defined I will now state the affirmative value which is the state. ... Observation 1: Because the resolution presents the debate of the two opposing sides in times of military conflict, the affirmative would only be infringing on rights when times that national security is at stake and would only be temporary until security is restored.