Are Jury Trials A Help To Justice
Synopsis Jury trials are a help to justice. Many critics argue that the jury’s ability to understand technical evidence hinders the justice process, but as studies indicate, the elimination of the jury will not solve the problem. ... The jury possesses several skills that enable it to help justice. ... The freedom of not being bound to the law in a strict and technical manner as a judge, allows the jury to provide the communities sense of justice while containing the possibility of oppressive laws. Furthermore, the extensive research done on the collective ability of the jury endorses the fact that they are a help to the justice system. Are jury trials a help or hindrance to justice? Jury trials are a fundamental part of our legal system. Not only does it reflect the deep-seated convictions of humanity in the way justice should be administered, but it also provides a solid basis in the understanding of the history and function of common law against the tyranny of arbitrary punishment. The fact that many Asian and communist countries are reaching for the administrative system provides a refined picture of the jury’s importance. Including the jury in a trial not only involves the community in delivering justice, but it draws upon a broader sense of justice . ... Involving the jury also offers assurance that the community as a whole would accept the jury’s verdict as opposed to a judge, who maybe presented as over-responsive to authority or remote from ordinary peoples concerns. ... Therefore, it is essentially everyday people trying everyday people and bringing the community’s sense of justice forward. It has been argued that jury trials are a hindrance and therefore should be eliminated from the justice system . The main argument held against the jury system is that jurors are unable to comprehend technical evidence . Supporting the jury’s ability to understand scientific evidence is indicated in studies conducted by the New South Wales Law Reform Commission.