Women in Combat 3
Since the birth of our country, when they had basically no rights, women have been fighting for equality. The latest battle that women have engaged in is their right to participate in ground combat in the army and the marines. In recently written articles, Suzanne Fields and Lou Morano say that it is absurd to allow women to fight. They concede that there may be women who are qualified to fight, but observe that there are just too many down sides to granting women a right to fight. On the other side of the spectrum, James Dubik, Richard Lane, and Jay Wurts argue that women should be able to fight in ground combat. Each side has a valid argument, but on the whole, there are more points against women fighting in ground combat then there are for it. The first point against a women's right to fight is simply that men are physically superior to women. Feilds states "Women are held to different(i.e. lower) physical standards in training and the aren't expected to do the same heavy lifting as men, because they can't. Women lack the upper body strength"(Fields 2). By an overwhelming popular opinion, men fight better that women do. All other things being equal, a fight between men and women would be a
. . .
Some common words found in the essay are:
Desert Storm, Feilds Women, War II, Maxwell Thurman, Vera Krylova, Lou Morano, Jay Wurts, Women Combat, Wurts Krylova's, Publishing Co, women fighting, ground combat, women combat, fighting ground combat, william vesterman toronto, vesterman toronto, co 1997, women fight, mayfield publishing, fighting ground, ed william, mayfield publishing co, vesterman toronto mayfield, william vesterman, ed william vesterman,
Approximate Word count = 1232
Approximate Pages = 5 (250 words per page double spaced)
|
 |
