Should the US grant China the Most Favored Nation trade status

Respect for human rights should condition the foreing relation of the US. For this reason, the US government should not grant China the Most Favored Nation trade status. In the following policy memorandum I’ll explain the criterion used to make this particular recomendation.

According to William Clinton’s linkeage policy, human rights violations will be an obstacule for granting China the Most Favored Nation Status. On 28 May 1993, President Clinton’s executive order established human rights-related conditioning factors requiring the Secretary of State to recomend to the president by 3 June 1994 a non-continuation of MFN waiver authority for the period beginning 3 July 1994. In the case of human rights conditions “the Secretary of State shall also determine whether China has made overall, significant progress” . It is my recomendation that China should’t get this preferntial trade rate because its human rights record has not improved. The goverment of the People’s Republic of China is guilty of arbitrary arests, torture, political persecution, repression of tibetan no-vilent protesters, labour camp exports, pro

. . .
Some common words found in the essay are:
Human Rights, Tibet Daily, Wei Jingsheng, Commerce Department, Freedom House, University Yuanmingyuan, Clinton Congress, World Bank, Treatment Punishment, Republic China, human rights, mfn status, favored nation, loss mfn, human rights violations, rights record, influence religion, persons detained, china favored, negative influence, china favored nation, rights violations, favored nation status, human rights record, article claimed adopt,
Approximate Word count = 3822
Approximate Pages = 15 (250 words per page double spaced)